| Tuesday, March 28, 2006 |
| My thoughts on...the nude Britney Spears statue |
 It’s true what they say, art just isn’t what it used to be. A nude statue of Britney Spears giving birth to Sean Preston was made by Daniel Edwards. Yes, there she is in all her glory, on all fours and buck-naked on a bearskin rug. It is called “Monument to Pro-life: The Birth of Sean Preston”. The Pro-lifers are hailing the statue as a monument to pro-life, and hailing Spears for putting family before career, unlike many celebrities. I know, the Pro-lifers are really desperate for an idol. I didn’t know the cause was going so badly. While making the statue, emphasis was placed on her “lactiferous breasts”, “protruding navel”, “water retentive hands” and “widened hips for birthing”. But the thing is, Spears had a C-section! Plus she didn’t even pose for the statue.
When I first saw it, I said “What the…? Spears is doing porn now? Federline finally cleaned her out.” When recovered from the shock of it all, I realized that it was a statue. I kinda feel like a perv when I look at that picture. You know how awkward it is be staring at such a photo on a public computer, with people passing and staring at the screen? The question I hear everyone asking is “Why don’t they show the back end?” Because they know y’all are perverts, and you’ll corrupt the artistic integrity of the statue by making it a part of your sick, twisted fantasies. Enjoy it while you can guys, ‘cause that’s the closest you’ll get to seeing Britney naked.
|
Posted by Leon
@ 6:11 PM
Permalink | Audiolink
|  |  |
|
 |
|
|
|
